The Gendering of Careers Advice
Is Guidance just for girls? i have done quite a lot of student contact this week and most of that has been with females.
Monday: Time Management skills: of 16 students no more than 3 male
Interviews – 2 women
Tuesday: Careers Fair – could not really tell here but I am pretty sure women were in the majority.
Wednesday Guys: interviews – 2 women
Third year PhD induction: about 50 attendees – a ‘preponderance of Women’
Presentation skills training – 10 students – 1 male.
Thursday: Time management – 8 attenders – all female
IOP interviews 4 – 1 of them male
Friday interview: a female.
Is it the old adage: When a man wants to find the way he drives around till he finds it - a woman will ask the way.
Or to put it another way, sisters are doing it with advice and guidance.
Source Event
Last Friday was devoted to Nature’s science careers fair and conference. I was quite pleased to be invited to speak at the fair – some sort of recognition of what i have been doing here at King’s. Also some recognition of the role that professional careers advice can play in supporting the career management of researchers. Well done us – The Careers Group and King’s College Graduate school.
Chairing my sesion was Tristram Hooley of Vitae. Tristram is moving onto head the Careers Research Unit at Derby University. So our paths might cross again in that context.
I went to session on bid-writing given by Tony Woods of the Wellcome Trust. Strongly recommend people to listen to the pod-cast: lots of very common sense points about bid writing. It reminded me of the sorts of things we say about CV’s. He reckoned that he could tell in about 80% of cases whether the bid would get funded within about 30 seconds; a bit scary if you think that it could take 6 months to put a bid together. Its all in the project summary. What is the research question, will the activities proposed answer that question. Use the classic SMART objectives.
A UCL lecturer gave a very personal account of the unpredictabilty of a Research career which in her case spanned a number of separate disciplines and roles and a many countries. She was a Marie Curie fellow.
There was a talk form Merck serono about Clinical trials management, and then a mad presentation by the brilliant William Bains. He had the audience in stitches though a couple of very strait-laced people did leave in the middle with very concermed looks on their faces.
The apparently rambling talk covered a steely analytical brain that was determined to have some FUN. We started with Isaac Asimov and electric trainsets, silicon, the cost of filing a patent (30 quid!), the importance of the confidentiality agreements, science as a personality defect (“How many of you are scientists?” Forest of hands. “Well half of you are wrong and the other half have my deepest sympathy”, how to lose 12 grand ( he did it his way). He is the Eddie Izzard of Biotechnology start-ups. He is that good.
Working with PhD students
Kathy Barrett and I do the second of our sessions on this topic.
It feels quite nice and easy now – even though we had forgotten what we did on the first occasion. We had 5 internal people and 5 from other universities – Roehampton, Surrey, Northampton among them.
PhD students at Towers Perrin
My colleague John Childs did a visit to this Actuarial and HR consultancy this week. Here are his brief notes. Top line – PhD students very welcome to apply. ( vacancies in the HR practice.
Stephen Minger
Just got round to listening to a podcast by Dr Minger on his career. Inspirational. But why is it inspirational? Because – leaving aside the qulity of the work he leads here at King’s it is all so accessible. Here is someone who bumbled about a bit as a young adult – as most people do – and slowly focused his energies and values and intellect - a bit of luck, a mass of talent, an even bigger mass of discipline and dedication. We all get a bit cynical about institutions we work in, but if Stephen Minger works here – its got to be a great place to be. He had some interesting coments about talking to the media and standing up for Science – his area is viewed by some as ’controversial’ – so he feels its important to explain it to people. I am sorry to have to say it, but he has become a bit of a hero for me.
I discover the Social Research Association
How did I not know about the Social Research Association? Last night they put on a really good Careers Evening with speakers from NatCen, UCL and the Information Centre for Health and Social Care.
I recognised at least 2 current King’s PhD students in the audience – but there may have been more. It took place at the splendid offices of GfK (better known as NOP) We were on the top floor on Blackfriars Road – overlooking the thames and with a staggeringly beuatiful view of London on a summer evening – the grey edifices looking diditnguished in their sunlit grey – not drab as is sometimes the case.
I learned that Assocaition has a good job site.
Most people at the seminar seemed to be at Masters level – some already working in the field, some just completing courses.
Looking back over recent vacancies the head of the Association said that employers on the whole did not specify what Social Science discipline they wanted. They often asked for a mix of qual and quant experience (Quol and Quont is the accepted argot in the profession as i gathered). They wanted good report writing and presentation skills and evidence of stake-holder and customer relations.
2 researchers (1 qual , 1 quant form research giant NatCen spoke. The qual started her caree as a volunteer on an oral history project before spending 2 years with IPPR. The quant had done a politics degree (so not a quant degree) and had started as a researcher for an MP. NatCen has 360 staff of whom half are researchers – 115 on the quant side, 31 on the qual. Specualtive applications were welcome
Alison, from Government social Resarch commented that in Government you tended to move between projects – so you got variety, at the expense of being able to specialise. Jobs in this sector were plentiful at the moment – evidence based policy making relies on the gathering of lots of ‘evidence’.
Cath from UCL explained about the career path of acadmic social researchers and the necessity to ’switch’ to the academic track because you became an expensive ‘weight’ on research bids as your salary increases. The publish or perish issue. In her group looking at sexual behaviour / health only 3 of the group of 20 were on permanent contracts.
Bottom line – great website for jobs- including entry level jobs.
Law PhD’s and legal training
Question from a Careers adviser
I have been asked what the chances are for PhD students (both law and other subjects) of developing a legal career either qualifying as a solicitor or a barrister.
Do you know of any law firms/chambers which are keen to recruit people with this type of background? From the PhD students point of view they will clearly want that their academic studies are seen as an advantage. There are some very high powered bodies such as the Law Commission and I think some opportunities in Europe where this will be the case and I also need to find out more about these. In continental Europe and Scandinavia you need to study law for longer at to a higher academic level before you can start practising as a trainee lawyer and in the US the education requirements are higher than here too.
Answer
I have met a number of King’s PhD students who have gone on to do legal training – often with a view to specialising in IP issues. However I feel that the PhD is viewed neutrally. It suggests an ability to handle complex data and to test assertions rigorously. On the other hand it may be felt to promote a leisurely approach to problem solving at variance with the cut and thrust of legal dispute and litigation. I have no experience of Law PhD’s going on to legal training. Most people I have seen come from the other direction – from professional practice to academic research.
Interesting Job description – but what job?
You’ll be working with a wide range of electronic information to identify and interpret trends, patterns and associations in the data. This type of analytical work requires the ability to understand and capture the essence of complex problems. To carry it out, you will be using a range of software tools to develop innovative and effective solutions. You will also undertake a range of projects working with colleagues from different departments, and work alongside other organisations to help develop our data sources, analysis tools and techniques.
Whether you have worked with data sets in your academic career, IT or finance sectors, market, social or scientific research, you’ll bring experience of working with analytical and/or statistical packages and large electronic and hard copy data sets. The accuracy and effectiveness with which Analysts present their results will have a major impact on investigations and you will be confident communicating your findings to a wide range of audiences. Given the nature of the role it is essential that you are comfortable working with computers for long periods and handling large quantities of data.
What job? Intelligence analyst for MI5.
Psychometric Testing
Friday was psychometric testing day. Its never been very popular – and today, true to form, 4 students. They get a battery of 3 tests and are scored and normed against a population of UK undergrad and postgrad students.
What surprised is how positive the students were about the whole experience. They thought that it should be made compulsory! I think they liked the inherent drama of the timed test which is very difficult to finish.
I explained that for most firms this kind of test was increasingly done on-line, although it is quite common for candidates who do well enough to be invited for a selection centre to be re-tested to see if it was actually them who did the test not their much cleverer friend. Identity fraud being all too easy in the cyber-world.
How to succeed in your PhD
Tips from a PhD graduate: how to do well
- Take Initiatives
- Find your way around obstacles
- Get along with your research group
- Know how the ’system’ works
- Get things done
These are common to success in industry and the professions.
Academia is a business and ‘PhD student is a job title.
Don’t expect micro-management
Be tenacious: develop a thick skin.
Do something every day to get you nearer to finishing your dissertation.
Be flexible: you are at the bottom of the hierarchy.
I have more of these bons mots scribbled on sheets. i will blog them when I find them – and credit the author!
-
Recent
- Researcher Development Framework
- EMBL – European Bioinformatics Institute Open Day
- The Gendering of Careers Advice
- Who attends training?
- Feedback
- Freebie Training course
- Source Event
- Vitae Conference – canoes and canowledge
- Vitae Conference
- Working with PhD students
- Postdoc Career Management – or not
- More on Clinical Psychology Interviews
-
Links
-
Archives
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (3)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (3)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (2)
- December 2008 (2)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS